The Cloaked Prince of Kyiv: How Zelenskyy’s Webs of Deception Spun a New War Tapestry
Cultural Updates Now Available Brought to you by HumanistFreeAudio
Zelenskyy’s drones are the heirs to Venetian whispers and Richelieu’s relentless riders—proof that history’s intrigue never dies, it evolves.
On June 1st, 2025, Ukraine unleashed a campaign of precision and audacity that rattled the Russian military establishment to its core. In an operation reminiscent of the cunning subterfuge of Renaissance statesmen and the icy calculation of Early Modern spymasters, President Zelenskyy’s forces deployed over 100 drones to batter five Russian airbases, stretching from Murmansk’s icy inlets to Irkutsk’s far-flung fields. These were no trivial outposts: they housed Russia’s nuclear-capable bombers—Tu-95s, Tu-22s, Tu-160s—the airborne leviathans of revanchist former empire determined to project power beyond its borders.
The ingenuity of the Ukrainian strike lay not only in its daring but in its delivery: drones hidden in wooden-cabin lorries, smuggled piecemeal into Russia for 18 months under the guise of mundane transport. Unwitting drivers carried death and disruption in their trailers, only to watch in shock as the drones launched from roadside laybys, piercing Russian defenses with a vengeance. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) boasted of a $7 billion price tag for Russia’s aerial pride, while Moscow’s state media shrank from the truth, offering cryptic half-sentences and removed Telegram posts.
Zelenskyy, the statesman turned warlord of modern Europe, declared that 117 drones had been unleashed, 13 strategic bombers destroyed, over 40 hit, and a signal sent to the world: Ukraine would not bow to the Kremlin’s might. And with that, Operation Spider Web entered the modern pantheon of covert campaigns—a testament to the enduring power of guile in a world too often enthralled by rolling tanks and armored battalions. This warfare is new. Its dangerous. And it might prove just as deadly.
Of course, every commentator and amateur strategist has reached for the dusty volumes of Homer to draw the inevitable comparison: the Trojan horse reborn, this time with rotors and remote controls. But let’s be honest—been there. Done that. Saw the movie. Loved it. If you’re searching for real intrigue—schemes that shaped the balance of power and rewrote the rules of warfare—look no further than two epic contests of espionage and sabotage: the Ottoman–Venetian duels of the late 16th century and the labyrinthine intelligence networks of the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648).
Venetian Whispers: Espionage in the Mediterranean
If the world wants historical comparisons, skip the Trojan Horse—look instead to Venice in the late 16th century. Here was a city whose merchants traded in secrets just as seamlessly as spices and silks. The Council of Ten, established in 1310 after a failed coup, became the Republic’s shadow government, overseeing a vast intelligence network. In Ioanna Iordanou’s Venice’s Secret Service (Oxford University Press, 2019), she describes how the Ten “turned espionage into a civic religion,” blending diplomacy, subterfuge, and strict oversight.
Venice’s greatest cryptographer, Giovanni Soro, "Father of the Venetian Cipher," appointed in 1506, broke the ciphers of rival courts and foreign merchant houses alike. His talents were so prized that the Vatican itself requested his services to decode letters intercepted by Papal agents. As David Kahn details in The Codebreakers (Scribner, 1996), Soro’s team “redefined the art of state secrecy, balancing the need to know with the need to keep silent.” This was not espionage as an afterthought—it was as vital to Venice as the Arsenal’s foundries or the Doge’s gold ducats.
Venice’s methods were strikingly modern. Informants were recruited from every level of society, from gondoliers to glassblowers, weaving a web of listening posts in Constantinople’s Grand Bazaar and the dusty ports of the Levant. Reports were dropped anonymously into the bocche di leone, the carved “lion’s mouths” of Venetian palazzos—an early form of crowd-sourced surveillance. And these reports were sifted, sorted, and archived in the Avogaria di Comun, where they shaped decisions from grain prices to war declarations.
One directive from the Council of Ten, preserved in the Archivio di Stato di Venezia (filza 130, doc. 46), bluntly states to the effect of (depending on your translation and interpretive meaning): “We do not conquer with swords alone. Let our agents be our eyes, our ears, and our shield.” Their reach extended into the Ottoman naval yards, where agents paid scribes to copy shipbuilding manifests—intelligence every bit as vital to Venice as a well-aimed cannonball.
The Thirty Years’ War: Intrigue in a Europe on Fire
Two centuries later, Europe was a continent in flames. The Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648) was a crucible of religious fury and political ambition. But beyond the sieges and pike charges, the war was also an intelligence contest—one that made the Venetian networks look almost quaint.
Cardinal Richelieu (yes, that one), chief minister to Louis XIII, understood that war was not won solely on the battlefield. In William Church’s Richelieu and Reason of State (Princeton, 1973), Richelieu’s mastery of intelligence emerges: he orchestrated an army of diplomats, priests, and merchants, each feeding scraps of news back to Paris. Richelieu called these men his “invisible soldiers,” a phrase that could just as easily apply to the drone pilots of today.
The Imperial Reichspost, The Habsburg postal system founded in the 16th century, became a battleground of opened letters and forged seals. As Geoffrey Parker recounts in Global Crisis (Yale, 2013), Imperial postmasters in Prague and Vienna routinely cracked the wax of dispatches, reading the minds of their enemies one letter at a time.
Habsburg Emperor Ferdinand II, in a surviving letter to his generals (Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv, Vienna, Kriegsakten 1622), wrote: “Every fortress has a gate within the soul of its defenders; find it, and you shall enter unopposed.” For the Reichspost’s postal spies, those gates were opened with letters, not ladders.
The Thirty Years’ War also saw the rise of cryptography as a battlefield weapon. Richelieu’s agents encoded orders in shifting alphabets—Latin ciphers meant to confound even the Jesuits’ best minds. In one letter from Capuchin Father Joseph to Richelieu, still preserved in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the lines swirl in coded Latin, proof that in the age of pike and shot, words were as lethal as bullets.
Spider Web and the Spirit of the Renaissance
In this long arc of history, Operation Spider Web is no anomaly—it is a renaissance of these centuries-old lessons. Just as Venice’s merchant-captains carried more than cloth and cinnamon—concealing secrets within their holds—so did Ukraine’s lorries bear more than cargo. Each drone launch was a dagger in the ribs of Russia’s illusions.
Zelenskyy’s methods—camouflage, patience, infiltration—would be familiar to Giovanni Soro or Richelieu’s “invisible soldiers.” Yet, the tools have changed: encrypted radio bursts instead of folded parchment, fiber-optic cables instead of Venetian galleys. Ukraine’s drone operators mapped their targets not with compass and chart but with satellites and digital cartography. And yet, the mindset—the calm recognition that surprise and deception are the true soul of victory—remains the same.
For Russia, Spider Web was a revelation of vulnerability: bombers that once menaced cities now sat like great birds with broken wings. For Ukraine, it was a message to the world: we will not be outwitted, we will not be outmaneuvered. From the shadows of the Council of Ten to the flickering candlelit dispatches of Richelieu’s chambers, the game of shadows has always shaped empires.
The Eternal Game
If the past is any guide, the battle of drones and data is only the beginning. In Venice, spies once met in the candlelit corners of the Grand Bazaar, trading silver for secrets.
In 17th-century Paris, dispatch riders galloped through forests, carrying the lifeblood of states in wax-sealed letters. Today, drones trace the same lines in the air—an airborne conspiracy of intelligence, ambition, and human ingenuity.
As Ioanna Iordanou concludes in her definitive work on Venice: “Espionage was not a peripheral activity, but a central feature of statecraft and survival.” Zelenskyy’s operation is proof that this truth has never waned. The cloaked prince of Kyiv, with a thousand drones at his command, stands in a lineage that stretches back through centuries—a master of the old arts, newly armed.
Keep our content coming and free from the firehose of fascism. Please consider buying a coffee for some of our scribes.
SOURCES
Iordanou, Ioanna. Venice’s Secret Service: Organizing Intelligence in the Renaissance. Oxford University Press, 2019.
Kahn, David. The Codebreakers: The Comprehensive History of Secret Communication from Ancient Times to the Internet. Scribner, 1996.
Church, William F. Richelieu and Reason of State. Princeton University Press, 1973.
Parker, Geoffrey. Global Crisis: War, Climate Change and Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century. Yale University Press, 2013.
Archivio di Stato di Venezia (ASV), Consiglio dei Dieci, filza 130, doc. 46.
Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv, Vienna, Kriegsakten 1622.
Bibliothèque nationale de France, Correspondence of Cardinal Richelieu.